Archives for software

Subscription Models – A Bane on the IT Industry

In recent years, the software industry has undergone a seismic shift, with subscription models becoming the dominant method of software distribution. While proponents argue that these models offer flexibility and convenience, I firmly believe that they are a bane on the IT industry. Subscription models do not save users money in the long run, rely on people’s forgetfulness to extract payment, and are inherently dishonest.

Advocates of subscription-based software often tout the apparent cost savings as a key selling point. They argue that by paying a smaller monthly or annual fee, users can access the latest updates and features without the hefty upfront cost of purchasing software outright. However, this is a deceptive argument. Over time, the cumulative cost of a subscription can far surpass the one-time purchase price of software. It’s a cunning trick, where the software companies ensure a steady stream of income while the customer continually pays, often without realizing the true cost.

Once you subscribe to a service, it’s easy to set up automatic billing and forget about it. This hands-off approach may seem convenient, but it encourages a disconnect between the user and their spending habits. Users might find themselves paying for software they rarely use, or even forgot they had subscribed to in the first place. This convenient forgetfulness becomes a profit centre for software companies, as they continue to collect payments without delivering value.

Moreover, the subscription model fosters a sense of dishonesty in the software industry. Companies often use tactics such as automatic renewals, hidden fees, and complex terms and conditions to trap users into ongoing payments. It’s disheartening to see the industry resort to such tactics to secure profits. Instead of competing on the quality of their software, companies engage in a race to the bottom, prioritizing short-term gains over long-term customer trust.

But it’s not just customers who suffer from subscription models; the IT industry as a whole is adversely affected. Smaller businesses and start-ups, in particular, find themselves struggling to keep up with the ever-increasing software subscription costs. This hampers innovation and economic growth, as valuable resources are redirected towards software expenses rather than investment in new technologies and talent.

Indeed, as a seasoned player in the IT industry, BOSS IT has encountered numerous clients who have fallen victim to the subscription model trap, only realizing the drain on their bank accounts when it’s too late. However, we also acknowledge that subscription models can have their place if managed properly. It’s crucial to strike a balance and recognize that, just like managed services, they can be a way for companies to profit from the forgetfulness or ignorance of their users.

Managed services, when executed transparently and ethically, can be a valuable asset for businesses. They offer proactive maintenance, regular updates, and a support structure that can be a lifesaver for organizations with limited IT resources. However, when mismanaged or used as an excuse for lackluster customer support, managed services can indeed exploit the ignorance of clients, leading to a feeling of dependency that keeps businesses locked into costly agreements.

Similarly, subscription models can be a win-win scenario when software companies genuinely focus on delivering continuous value to their customers. Regular updates, improved features, and reliable customer support can justify the ongoing costs. However, when companies prioritize profit over customer satisfaction, they rely on users’ forgetfulness to keep the revenue stream flowing.

The responsibility falls on both sides of the equation. Users must stay vigilant, regularly reviewing their subscriptions, and taking control of their financial commitments. Companies, on the other hand, should embrace transparency, ethical business practices, and strive to provide tangible value for the fees they charge.

At BOSS IT, we firmly believe in responsible and ethical business practices. We advocate for subscription models and managed services that are clear, beneficial, and flexible to meet the evolving needs of clients. Our goal is to empower users with knowledge and understanding, helping them make informed decisions about their IT investments.

Why You Should Avoid Preinstalled Antivirus Software from Retailers

Purchasing a new PC is an exciting experience, but one decision you may want to reconsider is whether to keep the preinstalled antivirus software that often comes with it. Retailers like Harvey Norman and JB Hi-Fi frequently bundle their PCs with antivirus solutions, including popular names like Norton, Trend Micro, and McAfee. However, our 25 years of experience in the tech industry have shown us that these preinstalled options might not be in your best interest. In this article, we’ll explore the reasons why you should think twice before relying on these preinstalled antivirus programs and suggest alternatives that can provide better protection for your computer.

  1. Limited Choice: One of the main drawbacks of preinstalled antivirus software from retailers is the lack of choice. These retailers often push a handful of brands, such as Norton, Trend Micro, and McAfee, which may not necessarily be the most effective or cost-efficient options for your needs. This limited selection can prevent you from exploring other reputable antivirus programs that might better suit your requirements.
  2. Profit-Driven Recommendations: It’s important to understand that retailers have a financial interest in promoting certain antivirus products. The brands they push typically have partnerships or agreements in place that allow retailers to profit from each sale. This financial incentive can lead to biased recommendations that prioritize profit margins over your computer’s security.
  3. Deceptive Practices: Unfortunately, some retailers engage in deceptive practices when selling preinstalled antivirus software. They may use scare tactics to convince customers that they need additional layers of protection, upselling unnecessary subscriptions and add-ons. As a result, many users end up with multiple expensive subscriptions, only to find that they’re still susceptible to viruses.
  4. Specialized Removal Tools: Another significant concern with antivirus programs like Norton, McAfee, and Trend Micro is that they often require specialized removal tools to uninstall completely. This is a red flag in itself. The fact that these programs don’t uninstall easily through conventional methods can be frustrating and time-consuming for users. It raises questions about the user-friendliness and transparency of these products.
  5. Better Alternatives: There are several antivirus brands that offer excellent protection but are often ignored by retailers because they don’t yield the same profit margins. Brands like Avast, AVG, Malwarebytes, and Bitdefender consistently rank highly in independent tests for detecting and eliminating malware. These options are typically more cost-effective and provide comprehensive protection without the need for multiple subscriptions.
  6. Bitdefender Basic Protection with Added Features: For those looking for a robust antivirus solution, Boss IT offers Bitdefender Basic Protection starting at just $59-$79 per user per year, depending on the level of security you need, such as VPN capabilities. Bitdefender not only provides top-notch antivirus protection but also offers additional features like phone tracking, remote locking, remote data wiping, and even the ability to capture photos of potential thieves. This comprehensive package ensures not only your computer’s security but also the safety of your mobile devices and personal data.

Ultimately, the decision is yours. Whether you prefer Norton or any other antivirus program, we respect your choice. However, we believe it’s crucial to provide you with the information and advice needed to make an informed decision that prioritizes your digital security and financial well-being. Retailers may prioritize profits, but your security should always come first. By considering the alternatives and evaluating your options, you can ensure that your computer remains protected without unnecessary expenses or risks. Of course, we’re here to guide you if you are unsure.

Even our IT professionals acknowledge that relying solely on Windows Defender for virus protection may not be suitable for those who aren’t tech-savvy. It’s a risk we wouldn’t recommend. In our office and workshop, we install Bitdefender on all our PCs, not only to clean and disinfect other systems but also to ensure our own protection. Despite our expertise in virus prevention, we maintain Bitdefender subscriptions for added peace of mind.

Did Y2K Push the World Toward Windows?

As we revisit the Y2K bug scare, we find it was more than just a millennium panic. It played a significant role in the rise of Windows operating systems.

The Y2K bug, or Millennium Bug, was an alleged computer glitch caused by date programming in older systems. It raised concerns that computers would misinterpret the year when transitioning from December 31, 1999, to January 1, 2000, potentially leading to chaos.

Governments and organizations globally invested billions to supposedly fix and update computer code, ensuring systems could handle the new millennium. These preparations included software fixes and contingency planning.

As midnight struck on January 1, 2000, the anticipated disasters did not occur. However, the legacy of Y2K persisted in unexpected ways.

One outcome of Y2K preparations was the widespread adoption of Windows operating systems. How Convenient. At this time, I was punching away in Visual C# on my Windows 98 Packard Bell, I knew something wasn’t quite right. In my opinion, the Y2K scare accelerated the global shift toward Windows.

In the end, there were very few problems. For instance, a nuclear energy facility in Ishikawa, Japan, had some of its radiation equipment fail, but backup facilities ensured there was no threat to the public.
While Y2K didn’t lead to global disasters, it did prompt significant technology upgrades.

Windows emerged as a dominant player, thanks in part to its advantages during this transitional period.

Have you personally experienced or heard of any interesting stories related to Y2K. Share your anecdotes or insights in the comments below!